OFRN Old Family Red Nose Registry
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
January 23, 2018, 12:22:01 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
OFRNR is now on Face Book!
Just search for Old Family Red Nose Registry Inc.
Website: www.ofrrnr.com or ofrnr@ofrnr.com
Phone: 469-286-3767
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Old-Family-Red-Nose-Registry-Inc/645940998767318
70 Posts in 56 Topics by 1 Members
Latest Member: OFRNR
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  OFRN Old Family Red Nose Registry
|-+  Recent Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 7

 1 
 on: May 01, 2016, 05:55:34 PM 
Started by OFRNR - Last post by OFRNR
This will be only an information forum.
This will no longer be an membership forum.
This forum will be for the general public for specific information about the Registry of the strain of Old Family Red Nose (OFRNR), for the breed of the American Pit Bull Terrier.

D.M. Norrod
CEO-OFRNR INC.

 2 
 on: December 19, 2015, 11:35:14 AM 
Started by OFRNR - Last post by OFRNR
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:S.3424:

Here is a link to the actual bill. I couldn't open the link below.

 Mon Jun 28, 2010
 This affects all of us as pet owners and/or breeders.

 Please take a few moments to send a note to each of your Senators and Congressmen (go to: http://tinyurl.com/cx825 and plug in your zip code to get your representatives' email webforms).

 Ask them to "please OPPOSE the Puppy Uniform Protection and Safety Act (PUPS) that has been introduced in Congress". You can add more if you like, but at LEAST send this letter of opposition.

 Animal Rights activists want to take away our right to OWN/breed pets; this is just one attempt at a national law that would have grave impact on us, not only now but in the future. Please help us stop bills that target animal owners. Pass to anyone and any organizations that might have members that own or breed pets.

 Subject: PUPS BILL ANALYSIS

 Pass this on -- we need to stay ahead of this one .

 The Illinois Federation of Dog Clubs and Owners has prepared an analysis of the Puppy Uniform Protection and Safety Act that has been introduced in Congress. All dog owners need to take a few (15-20) minutes to read this analysis and urge their doggy friends to do likewise. All dog owners/breeders need to be knowledgeable about this bill and its potential impact on us.

 Note that if you have a website for your dogs, you are a potential target if this bill passes. It also targets breeders who "sells or offers for sale, via any means of conveyance (including the Internet, telephone or newspaper)" . That about covers everyone. It includes dogs owned, co-owned, etc. in determining if we are "high volume retail breeders". This bill will in essence make all of us "puppy mills". It is extremely important that everyone contact their legislators and let them know that you are opposed to this bill. This is not just a state issue....this is Federal.
 Forward it on to anyone you know who is involved in the fancy. We must act on this one immediately.
 Read the analysis of this bill very carefully!!


 IFDCO (IL Fed. of Dog Clubs and Owners) now has their Opposition
 statement to PUPS up on their website, including a full analysis of
 the bill. This statement represents the viewpoint of member Clubs and
 individuals who belong to IFDCO.

 It's on the Legislation page:

http://ifdco. homestead. com/legislation. html

 You can read the full statement here:

http://ifdco. homestead. com/IFDCO_ position_ statement_ on_PUPS.pdf

 Please read, and feel free to share the link with your clubs!

 3 
 on: December 19, 2015, 11:19:40 AM 
Started by OFRNR - Last post by OFRNR
http://www.angelfire.com/nv/bullrockkennelapbt/adopt.html
http://www.petfinder.com/shelters/LA102.html
http://dogs.about.com/cs/rescue/a/rescue_apbt.htm
http://www.vrcpitbull.com/

 4 
 on: December 19, 2015, 11:10:34 AM 
Started by OFRNR - Last post by OFRNR
Try some of these places.
 They might know.
http://www.pbrc.net/breedinfo.html
http://www.pitbull.us/
http://adopt-a-pit-bull.adoptapet.com/
http://spindletoppitbullrefuge.org/
http://www.pitbulllovers.com/american-pit-bull-terrier-rescue.html
http://pitbull.rescueme.org/NewJersey
http://www.pitbull-chat.com/showthread.php?t=4399

 5 
 on: December 19, 2015, 11:02:48 AM 
Started by OFRNR - Last post by OFRNR
D.M. Norrod
Joined: 09 Nov 2005
Posts: 1497
Location: IN.
PostPosted: 21 Aug 2014 09:37 am

Special interest groups like PETA (or any other of the new names they use, because of the bad press PETA is receiving) and other alleged communist, drug and terrorist funding groups, are trying to have anti-tethering laws passed.

 Their claim is, chains makes dogs vicious.
 The problem with this theory is whether or not it is a social behavior or hereditary problem.

 Vicious dog behavior is greatly debated on, how this is created and why does this behavior appear.

 It is basically the same debate in humans that are murders, are they born that way or are they a product of their environment?

 So does chains make dogs vicious?
 Not by simply being placed and left on a chain.
 If the hereditary fault is within the genetic makeup of the dog then it can manifest itself.

 Physical abuse, whether on a chain or not, it has been known to create ill-temperness.

 So what does these special interest groups suggest?
 1 hr. a day on the chain, 3 hrs off.
 No more then the total of 3 hrs on the chain for the whole day.

 So what does this leave, what the special interest groups call irresponsible owners?
 They will go out and buy cheap crates and pens and put them in an area where it they soil the area, the owner won't have to smell or deal with it.
 Not to mention the concrete pens they will freeze in, when it comes winter. Concrete gets as cold as its environment.
 Pens, dogs can escape from by digging or climbing out of. Or pressing on the latch hard enough until it turns and gives way.
 Because this only address tethering, not penning of a dog.

 Will government officials allow these fanatics play them as stooges?
 Or will they keep the best interest of the dogs in mind?

 Will they listen to the pro of tethering after they listened to the "con" job just ran on them?

 The pros to tethering:

 Keeps the dogs safe from interacting with other dogs where an altercation might arise.
 Keeps them from roaming and being a menace and destructive to personal property and physical harm to humans.
 Great for exercise. More square foot area then a pen.
 Cleaner then pens because ground allows drainage unlike concrete where water and the snow liquidates the feces, which in turn, soils everything in the pen area.
 Concrete pens are very cold and hot, depending on the season, and extremely hard on the joints, feet and bones of the dog.
 The dog becomes extroverted. Pens make a dog introverted. Pens make a dog be consumed in their own little world and takes on the behavior of a caged animal.

 These special interest bleeding hearts try to convince government officials tethering makes dogs human aggressive because they are deprived of food, water and housing. This simply is not true. Some cases this has happened but it has also happened INSIDE the home! Often dogs tethered are in better health and physical fitness then a dog kept in a house. No one can deny being out doors is healthier for animals then being kept in doors. Dogs need vitamin D to retain calcium for strong bones and healthy coats. This comes from being in sunlight. Most responsible owners who tether dogs have them equipped with automatic feeders and waters. Insulated dog house and bedding for the change of the seasons.

 These practices fall under animal welfare not under animal rights. God's will, Man was given dominion over all plants and animals on earth to do with as mankind see fit. Only a unchristian would want animals with equal rights as humans. Laws and life style where man is subservient to animals or of animal worship.

 It is the responsibility of government of the people of the United States to protect the Bill of Rights of humans beings of this country where laws are not passed to superceded the rights of the people. KEEP PEOPLE FIRST!


 

 6 
 on: December 19, 2015, 10:48:51 AM 
Started by OFRNR - Last post by OFRNR
We are trying to increase the sale of our No Trespassing signs to help NARLO grow. You purchased 7 of our No Trespassing signs a while back. We hope the signs have worked out for you. We would appreciate if you could help us again with just a minimal effort. Please forward the following message (below the line) about our specialized No Trespassing signs to the rural landowners on your e-mail list. They will be glad you did. It costs you but a few minutes of your time and it will help us immensely. You are welcome to modify our opening message, if you deem it appropriate.

 These signs have now been installed in the following states: Washington, California, Nevada, Texas, Tennessee, Indiana, Michigan, Massachusetts, Oklahoma, Georgia and Florida. Our goal is to have them installed in all 50 states in the next year.

 Hope all is well with you and your family.

 Thanks for your help and take care,



 Ron Ewart, President
 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RURAL LANDOWNERS
 P. O. Box 1031, Issaquah, WA 98027
 425 222-4742 or 1 800 682-7848
 (Fax No. 425 222-4743)
 Website: www.narlo.org

 Before sending to your list, erase everything above this line.

 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear (name of rural landowner)

 From:

 We purchased some excellent No Trespassing signs from the National Association of Rural Landowners and wanted to share the information about them with you. If you own an acre or more, you need these specialized signs. With the proliferation of government agents, letting them know with these powerful signs they are not welcome on your property without permission, could very well save you from serious fines and penalties that would be assessed if they trespassed on your property and found code violations. Not only is Big Brother watching you, they are trespassing on your land without permission, all over America.

 NARLO has indicated to us that should a government agent enter your land with these signs displayed, they are guilty of trespass and can be brought up on civil or criminal trespass charges, depending on the circumstances. NARLO went on to say that In some courts, the judges will waive any fines and penalties levied by government, if the government agent trespassed on your property in the presence of a No Trespassing signs.

 You can order the signs from the NARLO website (www.narlo.org/sign.html), or by using the attached order form. Your land may be your largest asset. It is certainly worth the cost of these signs to protect that asset from government interference and abuse of your constitutional rights?


 (This message is best viewed in HTML format.)

 From the
 "National Association of Rural Landowners"
 A Washington State non-profit organization
 "Working to protect rural landowners from Government abuse"
 (NARLO) www.narlo.org



 Tired of Government agents and others snooping on your land,
 who think trespassing is just fine and they have the right to do so? Install our copyrighted, specialized, intimidating
 "No Trespassing" signs and keep them off.

 Land Agents: You might consider purchasing them for your land clients.
 These signs have been erected nationwide and appear on rural lands in Massachusetts, Florida, Georgia, Oklahoma, Michigan, Indiana, Tennessee, Texas, Nevada, California and Washington.

 Order them from our website at www.narlo.org/sign.html using our PayPal feature and help NARLO to grow. Or print out the attached order form and send us your check or money order for the correct amount. Allow 2 to 3 weeks for delivery.

 If you have any questions you can write, call or e-mail NARLO at:
 P. O. Box 1031, Issaquah, WA 98027
 425 222-4742 or 1 800 682-7848
 (Fax No. 425 222-4743)
 E-Mail Address: info@narlo.org

 See a sample of these huge, powerful signs below.
 (If your browser won't display the sign, it is attached as a JPEG file)
 
http://narlo.org/

Once you actually post them, EVERYONE has to abide by a posted no trespassing sign and local or state laws can NOT superseded Federal law!


 7 
 on: December 19, 2015, 10:34:51 AM 
Started by OFRNR - Last post by OFRNR
http://petakillsanimals.com/

 8 
 on: December 19, 2015, 10:33:09 AM 
Started by OFRNR - Last post by OFRNR
http://search.yahoo.com/search?ei=utf-8&fr=slv1-cmty&p=Breed+Specific+Legislation+Yahoo+Group

 9 
 on: December 19, 2015, 10:27:19 AM 
Started by OFRNR - Last post by OFRNR
http://www.povn.com/rdows/

Check this out:

http://www.povn.com/rdows/banned%20breeds.html

 10 
 on: December 19, 2015, 10:25:11 AM 
Started by OFRNR - Last post by OFRNR
PETA - People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
http://www.undueinfluence.com/peta.htm

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 7
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!